Enterprise AI Security Services
Navira Security provides expert-led professional services across the complete AI execution chain — from prompt ingestion and RAG vector storage to foundation models, autonomous agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP) tooling, and SIEM detection engineering.
How to Choose the Right AI Security Service
Compare our 7 specialized engagement disciplines based on your primary architectural challenge, project timeline, and required outcomes:
| Your Primary Need | Service Discipline | Motion | Typical Duration | Primary Outcome | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Can attackers manipulate our LLMs or bypass guardrails? | AI Red Teaming | TEST | 2 to 8+ weeks | Exploit evidence, reproduction scripts & 45-day retest | View Scope → |
| What can autonomous agents access and execute? | AI Identity & Access (AI IAM) | CONTROL | 1 to 4 weeks | Machine identity catalog, token delegation & privilege graph | View Scope → |
| Can our SOC detect AI abuse and prompt injection? | AI Monitoring & Detection | MONITOR | 1 to 4 weeks | OpenTelemetry schemas, SIEM correlation rules & runbooks | View Scope → |
| Are agent Reason-Act loops and MCP tools safe? | Agentic AI Security | AGENTIC | 2 to 5 weeks | MCP schema audits, hardened proxy code & HITL gates | View Scope → |
| Is our AI architecture and vector storage partitioned securely? | AI Security Architecture | ASSURE | 1 to 3 weeks | STRIDE-AI threat model & vector namespace isolation audit | View Scope → |
| Can we prove controls for enterprise sales & compliance? | AI Security Assurance | ASSURE | 2 to 4 weeks | OWASP/NIST evidence dossier & vendor audit pack | View Scope → |
| How do we prevent regressions as models and tools update? | Continuous AI Security | CONTINUOUS | Monthly / Quarterly | Adversarial regression, IAM drift reviews & detection tuning | View Scope → |
TEST. CONTROL. MONITOR. ASSURE.
Explore detailed technical scopes, deliverables, timelines, and framework mappings across all 7 core disciplines:
Navira AI Red Teaming
Adversarial Security Testing for Production AI Systems
Find out how an adversary can manipulate or abuse the complete AI system — from prompt boundaries to tools, agents, and data stores.
Navira AI Identity & Access
Control What AI Is Allowed to Become, Access, and Do
Identity-first security for AI: unique agent identities, delegated authorization, least privilege, and approval boundaries.
Navira AI Monitoring & Detection
Turn AI Activity into Defensible Security Visibility
Telemetry architecture, SIEM integration design, and custom detection engineering for production AI workflows, tool execution, and MCP.
Navira Agentic AI Security
Secure Systems That Can Decide and Act
Dedicated security testing and architecture for autonomous systems: Reason → Choose → Act loops, MCP, and multi-agent coordination.
Navira AI Security Architecture
Structured Architecture Review & Threat Modeling for AI Workloads
A rigorous white-box or gray-box architectural review identifying systemic security weaknesses, data exposure risks, and control gaps.
Navira AI Security Assurance
Turn AI-Security Claims into Defensible Technical Evidence
Turn complex AI regulatory and governance requirements into audit-ready, defensible technical engineering evidence.
Navira Continuous AI Security
Recurring Security Advisory, Retesting & Detection Engineering
Monthly or quarterly recurring security advisory combining scheduled adversarial regression, IAM privilege reviews, and telemetry tuning.
How Navira Security Executes an Assessment
Step-by-step transparency from discovery call to 45-day verification retesting:
Business Purpose & Environment Discovery
"What are all the AI assets, environments, and business processes in scope?"
Systematic inventory of business purpose, system owners, environments, foundation models, agents, workflows, tools, MCP servers, data sources, cloud infrastructure, and current logging.
Core Assessment Scope
- ›Foundation model providers and orchestrators (LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, AutoGen)
- ›Human-to-AI interfaces, API endpoints, and internal operations copilots
- ›Data boundaries, vector stores, and external integrations
- ›Current security guardrails, logging infrastructure, and incident history
Deliverable Artifact Produced
Discovery Intake Dossier & Architecture Topology Matrix
Sample Deliverable: Finding Format & Reproducible PoC
Every vulnerability identified by Navira Security includes raw request transcripts, exploit payloads, telemetry traces, and verified code patches:
Indirect Prompt Injection via Ingested Document Causing Unverified Tool Execution
Executive Finding Summary
An attacker submits a supplier PDF containing white-on-white text directives. When ingested into the RAG vector index and retrieved by the FinOps assistant, the model interprets the untrusted document instructions as system commands, automatically triggering an unconfirmed wire transfer tool call.
Adversarial Attack Path
Business Impact
Direct unauthorized financial transfer up to account balance limits; potential for catastrophic wire fraud through zero-click ingestion of external supplier documents.
Research Backing Our Security Methodologies
Our commercial assessment methodologies are grounded in open reference research and reproducible lab harnesses:
State of AI Security
Academic research across IEEE/USENIX and open source GitHub ecosystem.
LAB 001RAG Injection Defense
Indirect prompt injection mechanics and strict XML boundary delimiters.
LAB 002Agent IAM Delegation
Short-lived OAuth tokens and confused deputy prevention for multi-agent loops.
LAB 003MCP Tool Poisoning
Model Context Protocol trust boundaries and parameter schema validation.
Validate Your Production AI Before Scale.
Direct scoping sessions with senior AI security researchers. First 5 clients qualify for our preferred Founding Client 1/3 launch pricing.